coal seam gas
2 Sep 2011
NSW Rubber Stamps Gas Drilling
Documents obtained under FOI show that the NSW Government allowed coal seam gas drilling exploration in Sydney while 'uncertain' about the risks, reports Wendy Bacon
The NSW Department of Primary Industries was "uncertain" about environmental impacts of coal seam gas drilling in St Peters when it approved an application by Macquarie Energy, now a subsidiary of Australian multinational Dart Energy.
Documents released as a result of a freedom of information request under the Government Information (Public Access) Act by No Coal Seam Gas Mining in Sydney spokesperson Jacinta Green reveal that the drilling licence approval process relied on a department officer rating risks to the community and environment as high, medium, low or uncertain. These ratings depended on the company’s own assessment.
According to the department’s approval document, dated March 2010, the drilling operation could intersect with the Botany aquifer which lies under the St Peters site. The department officer accepted the company’s claim that the drill will be "solid cased" but was "uncertain" about whether the environment could withstand the impacts, whether they could be reversed or whether the drilling complies with water standards.
Although no further studies were recommended, the officer found impacts could be "fully" mitigated.
The department was "uncertain" whether the operation complied with "standards, plans and policies" for air quality, "greenhouse impacts", and the use of "surface and ground water". It was confident the environment was "highly resilient" to "sediment laden water run-off" while it was "uncertain" about whether damage could be reversed or whether it complied with standards.
The department rated community concern over environmental impacts as "low" on all environmental issues.
Green says this is "pure fiction". When the approval document was prepared, "community concern was non-existent as no-one in the community knew that this proposal existed". There had been no consultation or even notification to community members or local councils.
Green told New Matilda the documents highlight why communities "have a right to be outraged at the complete disregard for impacts on the air, soil, water, environment and communities".
"While the present government cannot be held accountable for what was approved previously, this document highlights exactly why we need a halt on all CSG activity until we are ‘certain’ about the impacts on the environment including water, have some idea of mitigation," she said.
NSW Department of Primary Industries Environmental officer Michael McFadyen told New Matilda yesterday that while he signed off on the approval, another officer was responsible for the assessment. He said that the documents need to be explained "in context" and that he would respond to written questions to the Department of Trade and Investment Regional Infrastructure and Services (TIRIS, which now includes Primary Industries). New Matilda has sent questions about the approvals to TIRIS and will report on answers later.
Dart fails transparency test
Twenty-six of 58 documents concerning CSG approvals have been withheld by the department because Dart Energy does not want them released on grounds that they could prejudice the company’s commercial interests until its application to renew its licence is finalised later this year. This is in stark contrast to their recent public statement in which the company claimed to be "entirely transparent in its operations and to share information openly with local communities and regulators alike".
The department has agreed with the company that it will not release five documents including a brief of the company’s decision to vary its work program and several letters between the government and the company. (The company had originally intended to drill in St Peters this year but have now decided not to drill in Sydney until 2012. They are pressing ahead at Putty near Singleton in the Hunter Valley and Fullerton Cove in Newcastle.) The Government was prepared to release 21 other letters and documents but Dart has requested a review of this decision which will delay their release for at least several more weeks.
Community campaigners, who are arguing that no further licences should be granted until the safety of coal seam gas drilling has been independently proved, say the variation to works documents could contain crucial information about the scope and timing of work which should be released to the community.
Missing from the list of existing documents altogether is a report which the company was required to file as a condition of its licence. Another document recording minutes of the Exploration Titles Committee in 2008 appears to be unavailable because it has been "deleted".
The documents do add a little to who drove Dart’s successful bid for an exploration license across the entire Sydney basis and parts of Northern NSW.
As well as lodging a $25,000 deposit for the license, Dart had to lodge information about their capacity to pay for the $1.6 million St Peters’ drilling operation. The two statements were lodged by Stuart Rose, best known for his management role in controversial developer Rose Developments, which is seeking to develop the heritage coastal town of Catherine Hill Bay, and the Hardie Group, associated with Duncan Hardie, who until 2009 was associated with Huntlee New Town, the largest residential development in NSW. Both these companies struck problems when the NSW Land and Environment court found that their land swaps with the NSW government in exchange for development approvals were unlawful. The Hardie group and Stuart Rose each had a 20 per cent interest in Macquarie Energy. Their companies provided letters to the NSW Department of Primary industries in 2008 providing required assurances that they would have no trouble coming up with $300,000 each towards the cost of the St Peters’ drill. Both these companies were big donors to the Labor party during the NSW Labor government years. Macquarie Energy was taken over by Dart Energy last year.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Reddit
Newsvine
Facebook
Twitter
Discuss this article
To participate in the discussion Sign in or Register
Posted Saturday, 03 September 11 at 11:05AM
“Green told New Matilda the documents highlight why communities “have a right to be outraged at the complete disregard for impacts on the air, soil, water, environment and communities”.
Communities can be outraged all they like. Governments, generally speaking, just don’t care.
Individuals and communities don’t want us in Afghanistan either but we are told that we must ‘stay the course’.
Government by the people, for the people! When will it happen?
www.dangerouscreation.com
Posted Monday, 05 September 11 at 2:15PM
The ball is in your court, Barry.
Your government must make the decision and it’s hard to see anywhere else for it to go but a moratorium on all CSG exploration where licences have already been approved.
This is too important for city or rural communities to have mining of any kind rubber stamped for the benefit of these industries. Jobs must be secondary to the health and well being of communities and the sooner our governments help to transition workers out of these industries and into renewable energy ones, the better for job retention. That way, the loss of jobs issue disappears.
Posted Monday, 05 September 11 at 2:33PM
The N.S.W Government should go and get fracked. ‘cos they’re fracking corrupt.
Posted Monday, 05 September 11 at 3:04PM
An excellent article Wendy Bacon.
Neither side of politics cares how quickly they can shovel all the resources on the face of this world, onto the furnaces because that’s all their doing. Feeding populations to grow populations at a rate which outstrips the capability of product demand. Won’t last forever will be the political statement for it’s just about empty and those bonuses we gave to green technology research ran out when the resources became obsolete.
I wonder how many politicians actually think of New Zealand and the effects of using underground water in excessive amounts had on their country, or just what sort of sensitivity is involved in gravitational water tables.
The Holy politician with all the expert’s in their field of knowledge must be being ignored, because I wouldn’t call the expert stupid, that’s for sure.
Posted Monday, 05 September 11 at 3:07PM
Ironic that our corporate whores spout about “defending freedom”and yet rubber stamp the takeover and possible ruination of our country.I wonder what these individuals think,If they value their country or their childrens future?
Posted Monday, 05 September 11 at 11:13PM
Another wrinkle with this Coal Seam Gas (CSG) drilling activity is that of 23 common fracking chemicals used in Australia, only 2 have ever been assessed by NICNAS, Australia’s industrial chemicals regulator. The two that were assessed, have never been assessed for use as fracking chemicals. Moreover, despite the small concentrations used, the volumes needed are huge, so many tonnes of chemicals are used in each well. The National Toxics Network (NTN) is calling on state and federal Governments to urgently introduce a moratorium on all drilling and fracking chemicals until they have been independently assessed by the federal regulator. Their updated briefing paper can be downloaded from:
http://ntn.org.au/2011/02/21/call-for-moratorium-as-report-finds-frackin…
Posted Friday, 09 September 11 at 11:57AM
Wendy B. -Interesting.
Criminal negligency has too often been a cause of corporate crime.
Especially when it’s our ecology which is being victimised.
The NSW DPI is charged with preventing these crimes.
Who will watch the watchers (check the checkers)?
David G.- RE: For the people, by the people- if only our communities could keep it that functional and simple. Too much competition creates discord and corruption which.