cuba
7 May 2007
Paradise Left
The Left has got it wrong on Cuba, writes Antony Loewenstein
During a recent trip to New York, I spoke with writer, agent and activist Anthony Arnove about his experiences in Cuba. He had visited the communist country only once, with writer Howard Zinn, with whom he co-edited Voices of a People's History of the United States. 'Does the Left in Australia have the same problems with Cuba as here?' Arnove asked. 'There is no freedom of speech in Cuba,' he added bluntly. 'Why do many on the Left ignore this?'
A recent article by Australian academic Tim Anderson proved this very point:
In the US, 'freedom of speech' means that a handful of private corporations dominate the mass media.
In Cuba, the media (television, radio, magazines, newspapers) are all run by public bodies or community organisations. No private individual or investment group can capture or dominate public debate in Cuba. Nor is there mind-numbing, commercial advertising.
In the US, mass communications are dominated by consumerism and celebrity trivia; politics is about individuals seeking public office. In Cuba, mass communications are dominated by education and cultural programs; politics is about co-ordinated social responses to social problems Cuba is a democracy and the US is not.
This is embarrassing rhetoric from somebody who ought to know better. Anderson and his fellow travellers should know that pointing out the deficiencies of one system doesn't automatically mean endorsing the policies of another. The multitude of faults with US-style 'democracy' can be addressed in other forums, but nothing should blunt the necessity of critiquing the failings of Castro's reign.
Cuba is a police State.
After spending time in Cuba, it is clear that revolutionary fervour is virtually non-existent among the younger generation; and that the genuine successes of the country free healthcare and education, as just two examples are compromised by the Castro regime's repression of its citizens and its isolating them from information that is freely available in the West.
Such truisms do not mean, however, that US-style disaster capitalism is the answer. Indeed, many people I spoke to in Cuba were both wary and highly curious about a wholesale change of their economic system. The young, especially, were already embracing American hip-hop culture listening to Gangsta Rap or wearing signature fashion.
Rather than aspiring towards a Hugo Chávez-style socialism the Venezuelan leader, it should be noted, is not universally loved in Cuba due principally to his undying support for virtually every aspect of Castro's regime many Cubans' curiosity about the outside world cannot be restricted indefinitely by paranoid and parochial officials.
One of the key challenges for the Cuban Government is the availability of the internet. Although many young Cubans have access to a Cuban intranet that includes an email service and Government websites, full access to the world wide web is unavailable for most. I spoke to a student in Havana who knew all about the internet because he was studying IT, but he wasn't allowed to view the net himself. 'I don't think it's very useful to cut off information,' he said. 'Many of my friends are frustrated by this. What is the Government afraid of?'
The answer is clear. The regime has consistently said that full access to the internet is impossible due to the US's immoral and counterproductive embargo of the island, but as Reuters Cuba correspondent, Marc Frank, told me, this was pure propaganda. 'The two main security issues for the Government are [mobile] phones and the internet,' he said.
It is, of course, important to remember that the majority of Cubans are not spending their days wishing for internet access. More mundane needs, like food and solid employment, are far more pressing. But how the regime deals with these communications issues in the coming years will determine how fast the country embraces the globalised world.
Independent journalist Miriam Leiva is an intense woman whose husband, Oscar Espinosa Chepe, an economist and journalist , has been jailed and abused for opposing the Castro regime. She told me that their lives have often become unbearable because 'for Fidel, some prisoners are really his own' and he never forgives or forgets.
Leiva and Chepe were both quiet and determined people and didn't believe in violently overthrowing the Government. In fact, their requests were modest not unlike their crumbling apartment in outer Havana, a few rooms of clutter and leaking taps and they both articulated a steady move towards a more accountable and democratic system. 'Corruption here is rife,' Oscar said, 'and if you read the newspapers every day, it's like deja-vu. You can't find any useful information in them.'
The militant population of Cuban exiles in Miami, Florida, has led the campaign against Castro for decades but like for many on the Left in the West, a profound disconnect exists between propaganda and reality. Even many of the anti-Castro dissidents in Cuba told me that they opposed the tactics of the Miami Cubans. 'They don't really know what's going on here,' Miriam said, and their brazen support for dissidents only worsened their own lives. A number of dissidents told me that they strongly opposed the Bush Administration's attempts to unseat Castro and never took financial assistance from the US Government.
Real democratic change must come, if at all, from the people themselves, not via agenda-setting foreign forces reminiscent of clumsy US attempts to support opposition groups in Iran and elsewhere.
Cuba is a beautiful, beguiling and frustrating country on the brink of something. The future of the island depends on many factors, not least the US response to Fidel Castro's death. I asked Marc Frank how Cubans would react when Castro eventually died. 'They'll go to the beach,' he said, 'just like they did when he was seriously sick.'
I doubt this it's clear that Fidel still commands a great deal of respect for leading a nation through decades of change, turmoil, US pressure and Soviet collapse. It was harder to discern much love for him, however. Fidel's death will probably bring little short-term change unless, of course, Washington decides to embark on a not-so-subtle course of 'regime change.'
The so-called dissidents in Cuba may not represent a huge proportion of Cuban society, but their voices are vital to truly understanding the rich fabric of Cuban society.
If the international Left wants to do itself any favours and Tariq Ali has already articulated where they could begin they should be calling for reform of the Cuban system.
A truly open media, unfettered freedom of speech, and freedom of association are not merely Western indulgences. They are essential for any country to join the ranks of respectable nations.
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Newsvine
Facebook
Kwoff
Discuss this article
To participate in the discussion Sign in or Register
what happened to all the comments that used to follow this article? - they appear to have all been deleted? is this NM’s ‘open media’?
Hi Tim
On the previous newmatilda site comments on articles were posted on a separate section, the discussion forum. This included comments made in response to Paradise Left.
With the launch of the new site in January 2008, we discontinued this feature and decided to include comments in the same space/page as the article itself.
The legacy discussion forum was hosted on a different platform and therefore would not technically function if linked to the current site. We have not deleted the content on the forum and with ongoing development of the site will consider making this content available if deemed feasible.
Let me know if you have any further queries.
Regards
Rod McGuinness
General Manager
newmatilda.com
OK, fortunately I have a record of my earlier reply to Anthony - here it is again -
———————
Dear Anthony – you rely heavily on assertion and anecdote. There’s plenty of flimsy critiques on Cuba around. But since you refer to my article, allow me to respond to a few of the problems with this lazy journalism.
First, ‘Cuba is a police state’ – blunt assertion, no evidence. Do you mean that they torture and kill their citizens? You don’t explain. That’s lazy, and relying on US clichés. Unlike the USA, Cuba does not torture, send out death squads and engage in assassinations. Unlike Australia, they do not invade other countries and detain people without charge or trial. Unlike Colombia, journalists are not murdered.
Second, Cubans are not barred from the internet. It is very expensive for them, because they rely on satellite links. The US blockade prevents a direct cable link. This will change, when a cable is laid to Venezuela. I communicate with a range of Cuban friends (there are 45 on my Cuba email list). Only one has a computer at home, but the rest have free access at work; and it is not an intranet. The limited email service, without full web access, is/was a cheaper option. Full access internet cafes (and one free service in a Vedado library) have been in many parts of Havana for several years. It seems you didn’t look, in your one visit to Cuba.
Third, the problems of US ‘democracy’ can be “addressed in other forums”. Well no, not when you are joining in the US polemic against Cuba. Your idea of freedom of speech does not distinguish itself from the Murdoch-esque, corporate view of the world. You ignored my point that the greatest threat to democratic debate is the domination by a small group of private corporations. Is this no problem for you?
Fourth, your view that there is no “revolutionary fervour” amongst the young, and that love for Fidel Castro is “hard to discern”, is just a product of your connections and your brief visit. It’s silly to present this as social analysis. Despite ongoing economic migration pressures, support for the government is very strong.
Fifth, your chosen dissident Oscar Espinosa Chepe was not jailed for “opposing the Castro regime”. He had done this for many years, on various internet sites. You failed to tell your readers that his arrest and conviction in 2003 was for taking several thousand dollars from a US government program authorised under the Helms Burton Act, and designed to overthrow the Cuban constitution. Small detail.
Finally, your approach to Cuba hardly parallels that of Tariq Ali, with whom you seek to associate. While Ali wants to see a more open public debate in Cuba, he also regards Cuba as part of an “axis of hope” in the region. He doesn’t buy your ‘police state’ line.
You pretend to disavow the Miami mafia, but your embrace of the 2003 group of “dissidents” says otherwise. The US funded Miami groups, in particular the Cuban American National Foundation (CANF) have a strategy of funding “independent journalists” and “human rights monitors”. They also support bombings and assassinations.
Readers might like to do a little research on the CANF. They were tightly linked to those arrested in 2003 and have published Oscar Espinosa Chepe’s articles. They were also directly linked to repeated terrorist attacks on Cuba, including the bombing attacks on Havana in 1997 and support for Latin America’s most infamous terrorist (recently released in the US) CIA-trained Luis Posada Carriles.
Like ‘Reporters Without Borders’ (to whom you post a link on your website) the CANF and the 2003 group of “dissidents” were funded through programs of the US Government’s National Endowment for Democracy, Freedom House, the CIA front organisation the ‘Solidarity Centre’ and other schemes set up under the US State Department’s ‘transition plan’ for Cuba.
None of this is secret. Have a look at the internet articles by Diana Barahona and Jean-Guy Allard. They have exposed a range of secret US payments to journalists who write in support of US policy on Cuba, Haiti, Venezuela and Bolivia. Ten journalists in Miami were recently sacked for taking secret US government payments. As if the owners of these papers weren’t sufficiently right wing. Is this your ‘freedom of the press’?
Yes the media in Cuba is very ‘correct line’ and certainly unlike our corporate media – but why this extraordinary attack, staged interviews with US-paid agents and false accusations of a ‘police state’? Hmm, ‘Reporters Without Borders’ now has a ‘freedom of the internet campaign’, funded by the US government, one part of it aimed at Cuba.
One question, Anthony: who funded *your* recent trip to Cuba?
Best wishes
Tim Anderson
Great, thanks Tim
Regards
Rod
General Manager
newmatilda.com